Reflection is the most important practice a teacher can employee to improve their pedagogy. However time is scarce during the school year for this practice and the teacher is usually left to reflect during their months "off". Yesterday I experienced a rarity; a meeting in which I was allowed to genuinely reflect and then hold an honest discussion with my colleagues.
Our team of history teachers gathered to talk about team development. It was a frank conversation, the most honest we've ever had. We aired our opinions, spoke honestly about our professional relationships and issues, and still managed to be cordial after the meeting.)
So here are the revelations:
1. My classroom instruction is primarily personality driven, and not system driven. When I lecture, and students reject my lecture, I take personally. Why shouldn't I? I worked hours to present what I thought was a compelling presentation. Ultimately my personality is worked into the lecture. The ability to sit attentively through a lecture is an end goal for some of my students.
2. My classroom instruction needs to become more systematic. It is easier to defend a system, or adjust it, than it is to adjust my personality. A systematic, student centered allows me more time to work one on one, and enforce discipline.
3. I admitted that I did not like working as a team, because my commitment level to what the team is doing is low. I am hesitant to make additional commitments outside my own classroom door, because I might not be able to carry the extra weight.
4. My colleagues are very competitive, much more than I thought they were. They really want to exceed our CST growth goals.
5. Ranking someone as the weakest link (As in "We are only as strong as our weakest link") serves to maintain a pecking order in which the weakest link is perpetually labeled as such (Can you guess who was considered the weakest link?), until someone weaker comes along.
6. I work with a very competent group of folks who are very technologically savvy and really use educational theory.
7. The team is exclusively composed of "the glass is half-empty" personalities. This is evidenced by the fact that since we have begun working as a team our test scores have risen annually yet we continually forget that fact.
8. The dominant personality of the team was convinced that since only 45% of our students scored proficient or advanced on the CST we had failed the community.
9. He also stated that if we failed to meet our goal this year, "It would burn to work at the school". In other words he would be miserable. (Background: I have the majority of the tested students. I was told I was the weakest link. Who gets the blame if there is no improvement in test scores?)
10. I need to focus on what brings results and not on how many hours I put into teaching.
Another conversation emerged today, with yet more revelations:
1. One of my colleagues (He teaches A.P.) expressed that he thought I was teaching Community College level history in my High School classroom (I was pleased with this).
2. I agreed that I need to lower the level of my instruction to a true High School level.
So now it is back to the drawing board (This is why I never plan an entire semester's worth of lessons!)